In the wake of the Optus data leak, legislation before Parliament will lift
the maximum fine for serious or repeated breaches of the Privacy Act from $2.2m to up to $50m. But there are no guarantees that even the
strongest safety measures will prevent an attack. So, what does that mean for business and their customers?
Legislation before Parliament will lift penalties for serious or repeated privacy breaches, provide new powers to the
Australian Information Commissioner, require entities to provide detailed data to the Information Commissioner to assess public risk,
and give the regulator greater information sharing powers.
In a statement, Attorney General Mark Dreyfus said, “When Australians are asked to hand over their personal data they have a right to expect
it will be protected.” But the question is, can any business claim that customer data will be protected from hackers?
If a customer needs to disclose their personal information to your business to work with you, at the point the data is collected, your
business is the custodian of that data. A duty of care exists from the moment the data is collected to the point the information is no
longer required and destroyed.
The Privacy Act requires organisations to take “reasonable steps” to protect
the data collected. ‘Reasonable’ steps “requires the existence of facts which are sufficient to [persuade] a reasonable person.” That is, in
the event of a data breach, the business will need to prove the steps they have taken to protect client data.
Lessons from RI Advice
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v RI
Advice Group Pty Ltd was
a landmark case. While specific to the obligations of an Australian Financial Services License (AFSL), it demonstrates that ASIC are willing
to pursue not just companies that breach their duty of care but the directors and officers involved.
RI advice is a financial services company that, through its AFSL, authorised representatives to provide financial services. As you would expect, as part of providing financial services, the authorised representatives received, stored and accessed confidential and sensitive personal information. Between June 2014 and May 2020, nine cybersecurity incidents occurred at practices of RI Advice’s Authorised Representatives. Enquiries following the incidents revealed:
RI Advice took steps to manage their cybersecurity introducing a cyber resilience program, controls and risk management measures for its representatives including training, incident reporting, and contractual professional standard terms, but by its own admission, it took too long to implement.
RI Advice was ordered to pay $750,000 towards ASIC's costs. Handing down the decision Justice Rofe said, “It is not possible to reduce cybersecurity risk to zero, but it is possible to materially reduce cybersecurity risk through adequate cybersecurity documentation and controls to an acceptable level.”
Falling behind on your BAS lodgements looks like an administrative problem. Left long enough, it becomes an expensive one, because the GST you collected stays payable indefinitely while the GST credits you are owed disappear after four years. Here is what that looks like in dollars.
With negative gearing now quarantined for established dwellings, new house and land has become the sensible play for investors — but there is a trap in the first eighteen months. Interest on the land is denied, while interest on the construction is not. If the bank has written one loan, someone has to do the sums. Here is why it pays to split the loan before you sign.
When the draft legislation for the trust minimum tax was released, it came with a reassurance: if you do not want to restructure, you can simply make an election instead — no restructure, and no state stamp duty. That is accurate, but it is also a very small part of the decision. Here is why you should choose your structure for the eventual sale of your business, not for the announcement.
